Bimodules #
One frequently encounters situations in which several sets of scalars act on a single space, subject
to compatibility condition(s). A distinguished instance of this is the theory of bimodules: one has
two rings R, S acting on an additive group M, with R acting covariantly ("on the left")
and S acting contravariantly ("on the right"). The compatibility condition is just:
(r • m) • s = r • (m • s) for all r : R, s : S, m : M.
This situation can be set up in Mathlib as:
variable (R S M : Type*) [Ring R] [Ring S]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module Sᵐᵒᵖ M] [SMulCommClass R Sᵐᵒᵖ M]
The key fact is:
example : Module (R ⊗[ℕ] Sᵐᵒᵖ) M := TensorProduct.Algebra.module
Note that the corresponding result holds for the canonically isomorphic ring R ⊗[ℤ] Sᵐᵒᵖ but it is
preferable to use the R ⊗[ℕ] Sᵐᵒᵖ instance since it works without additive inverses.
Bimodules are thus just a special case of Modules and most of their properties follow from the
theory of Modules. In particular a two-sided Submodule of a bimodule is simply a term of type
Submodule (R ⊗[ℕ] Sᵐᵒᵖ) M.
This file is a place to collect results which are specific to bimodules.
Main definitions #
Subbimodule.mkSubbimodule.smul_memSubbimodule.smul_mem'Subbimodule.toSubmoduleSubbimodule.toSubmodule'
Implementation details #
For many definitions and lemmas it is preferable to set things up without opposites, i.e., as:
[Module S M] [SMulCommClass R S M] rather than [Module Sᵐᵒᵖ M] [SMulCommClass R Sᵐᵒᵖ M].
The corresponding results for opposites then follow automatically and do not require taking
advantage of the fact that (Sᵐᵒᵖ)ᵐᵒᵖ is defeq to S.
TODO #
Develop the theory of two-sided ideals, which have type Submodule (R ⊗[ℕ] Rᵐᵒᵖ) R.
A constructor for a subbimodule which demands closure under the two sets of scalars individually, rather than jointly via their tensor product.
Note that R plays no role but it is convenient to make this generalisation to support the cases
R = ℕ and R = ℤ which both show up naturally. See also Subbimodule.baseChange.
Equations
- Subbimodule.mk p hA hB = { carrier := ↑p, add_mem' := ⋯, zero_mem' := ⋯, smul_mem' := ⋯ }
Instances For
If A and B are also Algebras over yet another set of scalars S then we may "base change"
from R to S.
Equations
- Subbimodule.baseChange S p = Subbimodule.mk p.toAddSubmonoid ⋯ ⋯
Instances For
Forgetting the B action, a Submodule over A ⊗[R] B is just a Submodule over A.
Equations
- Subbimodule.toSubmodule p = { carrier := ↑p, add_mem' := ⋯, zero_mem' := ⋯, smul_mem' := ⋯ }
Instances For
Forgetting the A action, a Submodule over A ⊗[R] B is just a Submodule over B.
Equations
- Subbimodule.toSubmodule' p = { carrier := ↑p, add_mem' := ⋯, zero_mem' := ⋯, smul_mem' := ⋯ }
Instances For
A Submodule over R ⊗[ℕ] S is naturally also a Submodule over the canonically-isomorphic
ring R ⊗[ℤ] S.
Equations
- Subbimodule.toSubbimoduleInt R S M p = Subbimodule.baseChange ℤ p
Instances For
A Submodule over R ⊗[ℤ] S is naturally also a Submodule over the canonically-isomorphic
ring R ⊗[ℕ] S.
Equations
- Subbimodule.toSubbimoduleNat R S M p = Subbimodule.baseChange ℕ p